Much silly about in our town on this break for spring.
Styling and picture taking and crossing the walk and taking up the space like I’ve never seen.
Sold Out, No Vacancy, No Room in the Inn.
Puts me in mind a bit of when we came to town those many or so years ago. But, no matter, spring is springing and the flowers are blooming and the pollinators are busy.
Tempus fugits and on it goes.
Last week I read two of the most ignorant statements regarding healthcare ever uttered. Surprisingly, neither came from the White House.
The first, on CNN, US Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said, “And so maybe rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and they want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care.” Since much of the debate on healthcare is about low income Americans, Chaffetz apparently thinks poorer people (“they”), even poverty level people, spend “hundreds of dollars” on iPhones. And since poverty is defined as “having insufficient income to provide the food, shelter and clothing needed to preserve health,” it is irresponsible and idiotic to suggest that people who cannot afford adequate food somehow spend “hundreds of dollars” on iPhones.
The second statement was from a doctor, freshman Rep. Roger Marshall, R-Kansas, who said, “Just like Jesus said, ‘The poor will always be with us,'” and “There is a group of people that just don’t want healthcare and aren’t going to take care of themselves.” In addition, according to the Washington Post, “He added that ‘morally, spiritually socially,’ the poor, including the homeless, ‘just don’t want health care.'” Obviously, Marshall has never had to choose between buying food, paying the electricity bill, or going to a doctor (he was an OB-GYN) for a cold or a dentist for a toothache and just doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
That these two men, whose statements clearly show prejudicial attitudes that are ignorant beyond comprehension, are among those who are partially responsible for passing a health care law that supposedly will be fair and affordable for all Americans is absurd. And, unfortunately, there are plenty (all?) of Republican congressmen in Texas who regularly seek to insure that Jesus was right – that “The poor will always be with us” – by voting against increases in the minimum wage, a habit especially hurtful to low wage earners in the Big Bend and all along the border with Mexico.
Briefly researching the psychology of being poor, I came across a study by a Princeton University Fellow which showed that “poor people…pay special attention to prices, and juggle resources carefully. But their intense focus on stretching their scarce resources can absorb all their mental capacity, leaving them with little or no ‘cognitive bandwidth’ (think energy or ambition) to pursue job training, education, and other opportunities that could lead them out of poverty.” In other words: poor people do the best they can but poverty breeds more poverty.
So, please pay attention to how our senators and congressmen vote. It’s the only way out of this mess.
I am an aviation historian doing research on a two-engine advanced trainer, the Curtiss-Wright AT-9 “Jeep.”
At least 18 AT-9As were assigned to Marfa AAF between January 21, 1943 and February 9, 1943. Most were later reassigned to Yuma AAF, AZ.
I am endeavoring to locate just one decent photo of an AT-9 with appropriate stationed codes (I believe the letter “N” followed by three numbers) while stationed at MAAF.
It is my hope that your readership or perhaps historians of the station that you may have prior contact with may be able to assist with this quest.
Dan Hagedorn, Curator Emeritus
The Museum of Flight
Boeing Field, Seattle, Washington
Resist the Destruction of Our Health Care System;
Please, please don’t be believing what Republicans say about the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). They insist immediate repeal is the only remedy for problems that don’t really exist and they ignore improvements that could make it better.
A fundamental of insurance is making the pool of payers and beneficiaries as broad as possible. Mandates to get insurance do that. They’re much like requirements to insure vehicles or homes mortgages. With health insurance, sooner or later, most people are going to need to use it. Unless it is required and affordable, millions simply won’t have it when the need arises. Republicans call it “freedom” to eliminate the mandates, but no person can truly be free if they’re injured, sick or economically stressed.
Republicans proclaim the ACA a “disaster,” “collapsing under its own weight,” “in a death spiral,” etc., but the actuaries say otherwise. It is actually succeeding – over 20 million now with access to care, millions who have gotten care they would not otherwise have received, including preventive care, cancer treatment, emergency surgeries and drug abuse treatment, lives saved, bankruptcies avoided. Thirty-one states plus D.C. that expanded Medicaid are doing very well, hospitals have stayed open, and the health care and small business sectors of the economy are growing.
It’s failing, Republicans claim, because premiums are rising. Never mind that premium increases are smaller now than they were before ACA and that most of the increases are not paid by individuals. It’s failing, they say, because insurers are leaving the market. But neither of these are the measure of success of the health insurance system and both of these were caused in part by Republican-dictated limitations on backup reinsurance for insurers. The measure of a health care system is the care it gives to people, not how well the insurers are doing.
What are the Republican solutions in the bill they’re ramming through Congress without hearings, discussion with the public and amendments?
* Cost controls? – Zip, nada, zero proposed
* Huge tax cuts for the well-to-do, including tax breaks for insurance companies that overpay their CEOs. They’re there and are the real purpose of the legislation!
* “Buying insurance across state lines” – Deceptive rhetoric because actually it means doing away with minimum standards for insurance coverage. We buy insurance across state lines already, but all plans must cover a minimum of services. Doing away with standards returns us to the bad old days of junk insurance that didn’t cover care bought in a state with lower standards.
* Health savings accounts – existed before and after ACA but serve only the well to do.
* High risk pools – also there before ACA and don’t work because they wall off those with the highest expenses (the greatest need) into high-cost pools.
* Reduced financial assistance for those receiving advanced tax credits – something sure to make many drop insurance despite need if it’s no longer mandatory. Then if they can’t pay for a couple of months, there is a 30% surcharge added to the costs they already couldn’t pay in order to get reinsured.
* Block grants to states for Medicaid that don’t fully cover the costs, and fazing out of Medicaid expansions whereby 11 million citizens get care. By the way, did you know that half of all babies born in the US are paid by Medicaid? Did you know that when we have exhausted all our resources at the end of life, Medicaid pays for nursing home and hospice care?
Everything they are ramming through Congress will result in sicker people, higher costs for middle and low income families, a crippled economy, huge breaks for the wealthy and a return to junk insurance. They call it “patient-centered” care but it really puts insurance companies back in control of your health care decisions.
Before the Affordable Care Act was passed, 70% of the American people supported its provision and now 58% want it kept as is or improved. But from the Speaker of the House Paul Ryan we have this exact quote: “…we’re not going to give up on destroying the health care system for the American people.” They will do it too, unless you speak out now. Call you U.S. Representative and Senators at (202) 224-3121.
Mary Bell Lockhart